Skip to main content
Glama
Ravinder82

jev-flash-router

by Ravinder82
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-flash-router

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • JevMCP

      NicolasRisso
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to offload yes/no, multiple-choice, and scoring questions to TypeSafe's Jev, returning compact confidence-scored answers to save tokens and improve speed.
      1
      MIT

    • ai-to-agent-jev-mcp

      draiagent
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code agents to perform structured decision-making through TypeSafe Jev, supporting yes/no checks, route selection, scoring, and batched multi-question judgments with confidence values.
      1
      -

    • jev-agent-mcp

      thedv91
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding or reasoning agents to request structured judgments from TypeSafe's Jev model at decision points, including choices, scores, claim verification, and code reviews, with probabilities and confidence returned as data.
      5
      9 npm
      MIT

    • jev-mcp

      rajasekharponakala
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to obtain typed judgments from TypeSafe's Jev System One models, including yes/no probabilities, multiple-choice selections with distributions, and rubric-based scores, directly usable in code.
      5
      2
      AGPL 3.0

    • openrouter-jev-mcp

      ctmx
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to obtain probabilistic decisions from Jev AI via OpenRouter for classification, scoring, and validation, with tools like jev_check, jev_classify, jev_score, and jev_evaluate.
      5
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of an agent confusing it with another. Its purpose is stated clearly and does not overlap with anything else in the set.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single tool name uses a clear snake_case verb_noun format: evaluate_decision. With only one tool there is no broader naming pattern to compare against, so it cannot earn a full 5.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is acceptable for a narrowly scoped decision engine, but the surface feels thin for a server named as a 'router.' It is on the borderline: useful but unlikely to cover a real workflow by itself.

    Completeness3/5

    The core evaluation/probability function is present and well described, but there is no follow-up mechanism to apply the decision or inspect routing outcomes. The description implies integration with planning, yet the server stops at returning probabilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources