Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AddressIntel MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server providing direct, credentialed access to parcel data via Regrid and county ArcGIS sources, with tools for querying by point, owner, size, and county.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying the San Diego Municipal Code, bulletins, permits, parcels, and zoning data with citations and freshness guarantees.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server providing real estate regulatory intelligence (zoning, permits, entitlements, deal scoring) for US properties, enabling AI agents to access 10 callable tools.
      12
      5 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server for querying a PropertyRadar flip-tracking Supabase database. It offers read-only tools for searching properties, retrieving flip history, summarizing metrics, and running SQL queries.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes a Hawaii property pipeline as Claude tools, allowing natural language queries about parcel records, hazards, zoning, ADU eligibility, and more, based on real public data.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      French building permits MCP server: 1.2M Sitadel permits (2014-2026, daily refresh), DVF transactions, cadastre DGFiP, PLU zoning, BRGM risks, and property-dealer opportunity scoring through 11 MCP tools. Free tier 500 req/month, no credit card.
      11
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_permits is unique, and the four list_* tools each target different criteria (SB9, ADU, redevelopment, market signals). However, list_redevelopment_leads and list_market_signals could overlap in identifying teardowns, and all list tools produce property leads, so there is minor potential for confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a verb_noun pattern with snake_case, which is consistent. The primary deviation is the verb set: search, list (four times), and get. This is a minor inconsistency because most tools use 'list' but search_permits and get_property_intelligence use different verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool serves a distinct function in the real estate lead generation domain, and the count feels neither bloated nor sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow is covered: search permits, generate multiple types of leads, and get detailed intelligence—though get_property_intelligence only takes ids from list_market_signals, leaving other lead lists without a deep-dive follow-up. Minor gaps like no general address lookup or update/delete operations are acceptable for a read-only intel server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues