Delete event
arcane_event_deleteRemove a Docker event from the history by providing its event ID.
Instructions
Delete an event from the history
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| eventId | Yes | Event ID to delete |
arcane_event_deleteRemove a Docker event from the history by providing its event ID.
Delete an event from the history
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| eventId | Yes | Event ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint: true, and the description aligns with that. However, no additional behavioral context (e.g., irreversibility, impact on related data) is provided beyond the annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that directly states the tool's purpose with no extraneous words. It is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple deletion tool with one parameter and clear annotations, the description is nearly complete. Could optionally mention that the deletion is permanent, but it is not essential given the destructiveHint.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the schema description for 'eventId' is adequate. The description does not add extra meaning or format details beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The title and description clearly state the action (Delete) and the resource (event from history). It distinctly separates from sibling tools like 'arcane_event_create' and 'arcane_event_list'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. The description is a bare statement of function without context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RandomSynergy17/Arcane-MCP-Server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server