Skip to main content
Glama
Rabin0404

pg-mcp-bridge

by Rabin0404
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to pg-mcp-bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • postgres-mcp

      jmluque72
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for PostgreSQL that enables Cursor and other MCP clients to execute SQL queries, list tables, and explore database schemas via HTTP.
      1,023
      MIT

    • PostgreSQL MCP Server

      PhySci
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying PostgreSQL database metadata including table lists and schema information through the MCP protocol. Supports stdio transport for Cursor/IDE integration as well as HTTP transport with health check endpoints.
      2
      MIT

    • mcp-wp-remote

      WileySolutions
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A STDIO bridge for connecting to WordPress sites via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling communication between MCP clients and WordPress installations running the websamurai plugin.
      9
      MIT

    • proxycept-mcp

      MoathOthman
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A thin stdio-to-HTTP bridge that forwards MCP messages to the hosted Proxycept server, enabling stdio-only MCP clients to access Proxycept's tool catalog.
      47
      MIT

    • mcp-bridge

      Slothtron
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local stdio MCP server that bridges remote Streamable HTTP MCP servers to MCP clients, enabling transport normalization and optional outbound HTTP proxy support for restricted networks.
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, unique purpose: listing schemas, listing tables, describing columns, running SQL queries, and checking connectivity. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as list_schemas, list_tables, describe_table, query, and ping. The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server covers all essential operations for a PostgreSQL bridge: schema exploration, table metadata, column details, arbitrary SQL execution, and connectivity checks. The count is well-scoped without unnecessary extras.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is complete for its domain, providing full CRUD-like capabilities through the general query tool, plus necessary introspection tools. There are no obvious gaps; it supports both read and write operations as per access mode.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources