Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
EGO_WEBQA_HTTP_PASSWORDNoPassword for HTTP Basic authentication when auditing authenticated previews.
EGO_WEBQA_HTTP_USERNAMENoUsername for HTTP Basic authentication when auditing authenticated previews.
EGO_WEBQA_EXTRA_HTTP_HEADERSNoJSON object string of extra HTTP headers to send when auditing authenticated previews, e.g. {"X-Preview-Key":"agent-key"}.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
audit_web_pageA

Audit a generated page in a real browser and return deterministic evidence.

Provide exactly one of url or directory. The result is blocked when the page has a delivery error; warnings remain visible but do not block unless fail_on_warn is enabled in the JSON config. This checks delivery usability, not security, WCAG conformance, visual regression, or real-device Safari parity. Use browser_engine="webkit" for a WebKit approximation only.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of selecting the wrong tool or confusing overlapping purposes. The single tool's intent is explicit and self-contained.

Naming Consistency5/5

The lone name `audit_web_page` follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention. There are no competing names to create inconsistency.

Tool Count4/5

A single tool is thin, but it matches the server's narrow, focused purpose of auditing a generated web page in a real browser. It is slightly under-scoped rather than bloated.

Completeness3/5

The audit operation itself is well-covered and explicitly bounded (delivery usability, not security/WCAG/visual regression/Safari parity). However, there are no supporting operations such as listing past audits, batch auditing multiple pages, or managing the referenced JSON config, leaving some workflow dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues