search_blendkit_assets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses return format (dictionary with asset objects) and important details like thumbnailUrls, files, downloadUrl. Mentions limit max 15. No annotations exist, so description carries full burden sufficiently.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with Args and Returns sections, front-loaded with main purpose. Could be slightly more concise, but every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so return structure description is valuable. Covers purpose, parameters, and returns adequately. Missing error handling or rate limits, but sufficient for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description compensates fully by explaining each parameter with examples (e.g., 'chair', 'wood'), enum values, and adding behavior like max limit of 15 not present in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it searches for 3D assets in the Blendkit library, with explicit mention of search term and asset type. Distinguishes from sibling 'get_asset_download_url', which is for downloading, not searching.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context for when to use (searching assets) and describes parameters. However, does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternative tools beyond the sibling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.