Skip to main content
Glama
RMITBLOG

Parallels RAS MCP Server

by RMITBLOG
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Sites

ras_infra_get_sites
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all sites configured in a Parallels RAS farm, including status, to check connectivity, verify configuration, or audit multi-site topology.

Instructions

List all sites configured in the RAS farm and their status. Multi-site deployments distribute infrastructure across locations. Use this to check site connectivity, verify configuration, or audit farm topology.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax rows after filtering. Default 50, max 200. Prefer narrowing with `filter` over raising the limit.
fieldsNoTop-level keys to keep on each row. Unknown keys are dropped. Use this to shrink large responses to only the columns you need.
filterNoEquality filter on top-level fields (AND across keys). String values match case-insensitively.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.3.0
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / fields
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Top-level keys to keep on each row. Unknown keys are dropped. Use this to shrink large responses to only the columns you need.",
+  "items": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / filter
      Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "number",
+      "boolean"
+    ]
+  },
+  "description": "Equality filter on top-level fields (AND across keys). String values match case-insensitively.",
+  "type": "object"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Max rows after filtering. Default 50, max 200. Prefer narrowing with `filter` over raising the limit.",
+  "maximum": 200,
+  "minimum": 1,
+  "type": "integer"
+}
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and openWorld, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the domain context that multi-site deployments distribute infrastructure across locations, which frames why status/connectivity matters. It stops short of describing pagination or the shape of returned rows, so not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: purpose first, then domain context, then use cases. No filler and the primary action is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with annotations, a fully documented schema, and no output schema, the description covers purpose, context, and use cases. Minor gap: beyond 'and their status' it doesn't characterize what the returned rows contain, but that is a small omission for a simple listing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the limit/fields/filter params are fully documented in the schema itself. The description adds no parameter-level detail, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List'), resource ('all sites configured in the RAS farm'), and scope ('and their status'). It's distinguishable from per-site siblings like ras_site_get_ad_integration, which read one site's settings, versus this farm-wide topology listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use cases: 'check site connectivity, verify configuration, or audit farm topology.' However it names no alternatives or exclusions, so the agent must infer that per-site tools handle site-specific settings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools