Skip to main content
Glama
RFingAdam

EMC Regulations MCP Server

by RFingAdam
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to EMC Regulations MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-server-3gpp

      Lee-SiHyeon
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve information from 3GPP specification documents, including full-text search and specific lookup for LTE and 5G NAS cause values. It comes with pre-processed data for major specifications covering NAS, RRC, and protocol conformance testing.
      3
      5
      MIT

    • 3GPP MCP Server

      edhijlu
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access and search 3GPP telecommunications specifications through direct integration with the TSpec-LLM dataset. Provides real-time specification content, implementation requirements, and multi-spec comparisons for 3GPP standards development.
      4
      117 npm
      29
      MIT

    • mcp-ltspice-qucs

      RFingAdam
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to design RF filters and SMPS-EMC from spec using three MCP servers that drive LTspice, Qucs-S, and scikit-rf, with closed-form synthesis, real-component optimization, and CISPR-aware compliance checking.
      2
      AGPL 3.0

    • regs-knowledge

      spray272598
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval and comparison of automotive regulations and standards, plus question answering where every answer must carry standard number, clause number, and original excerpt, with unsupported conclusions flagged for review. Java backends and Feishu can call it directly over MCP.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 45 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, e.g., separate tools for different CISPR parts and FCC parts. However, some overlap exists between advisor tools (certification_matrix, product_certification_advisor, market_requirements) and test planners (test_plan_generator, immunity_test_plan), though descriptions clarify roles.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names predominantly follow a descriptive noun_verb pattern (e.g., cispr12_limit, fcc_part15_limit, lte_band_lookup). Some abbreviations are used consistently, but a few names like 'frequency_to_band' break the pattern. Overall, naming is clear and mostly consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    45 tools is excessive for typical server usage, risking agent confusion and selection overhead. While the domain is broad, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., merging related limit queries or test planners). This high count likely degrades coherence.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set thoroughly covers EMC regulations: limits from major standards (CISPR, FCC, ISED), test methods (automotive, medical, general), certification roadmaps, market-specific requirements, and cross-references. No obvious gaps for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources