Resume a paused CST simulation to continue from where it stopped, enabling completion of interrupted solver runs without restarting.
Resume a previously paused CST simulation. Use after cst_pause_simulation to continue from where it stopped.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.2.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description carries full burden. States it resumes and continues from where it stopped. Does not disclose error states or prerequisites, but the behavior is straightforward.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, then usage guideline. No unnecessary words. Highly concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and simple behavior, the description is fully complete. It covers intent, prerequisites, and context among siblings.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4. Description adds no param info, but none needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Resume a previously paused CST simulation', specifying the verb 'resume' and resource 'CST simulation'. It distinguishes from siblings by referencing cst_pause_simulation and implying a sequence.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly says 'Use after cst_pause_simulation', providing clear context. Lacks mention of when not to use (e.g., for non-paused simulations) and alternatives like cst_run_simulation for fresh starts, but adequate for a simple tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.