Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Harthad Status MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Institutional MCP server that centralizes access to identity, institutional profiles, and basic person data. Currently a bootstrap with no business logic or tools implemented.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a reusable MCP server foundation with explicit tool registration, operation-mode separation, scope-based permissions, structured results, and built-in health/status tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP client interaction via streamable HTTP, providing example tools (echo, getPostsByUser) and resources (posts, users) with pluggable authentication providers.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) that provides REST API endpoints for managing and interacting with MCP resources.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have clear resource+action targets, but create_entry vs create_changelog_entry vs create_comment blur together, and update_service (status change creates a changelog atomically) overlaps conceptually with create_changelog_entry (records a status transition atomically). The read tools (get_status, get_context, get_profile, get_changelog) are distinguishable but adjacent enough to require careful reading.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All ten tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_, create_, update_, list_). The only mild quirk is that create_entry doesn't name the entity type the way create_changelog_entry and create_service do, but the convention itself is unbroken.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal range, and each maps to a plausible operation (read profile/status/context, manage services, manage changelog and entries, comment). No filler or redundant wrappers.

    Completeness3/5

    The service and changelog surfaces are reasonably covered, but there is no read/list for entries or comments (only creation), no delete or update for entries/changelog, and no delete_service. Agents attempting to inspect or clean up created data will hit dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues