Skip to main content
Glama
Reins

Reins

Official

Close a position

close_position

Flatten an entire symbol position with a reduce-only order crossing the spread, lowering risk even when daily loss limits halt new trading.

Instructions

Flatten the whole position in one symbol with a reduce-only order that crosses the spread. This reduces risk, so it is permitted even when the daily loss limit has halted new trading.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "symbol": "<symbol>",
      "reason": "<reason>"
    },
    "name": "close_position"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
reasonYesWhy you are closing this position, in one or two sentences.
symbolYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.6

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does well: it discloses that the order is reduce-only and crosses the spread (i.e. it will take liquidity rather than rest), and that it is exempt from the loss-limit halt. It does not cover failure modes (e.g. no open position), irreversibility, or what the response contains, which keeps it short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler, and the core action is front-loaded ahead of the permission nuance. Each sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description supplies the essentials an agent needs to act safely: the order type, the price behavior, and the halt exemption. Remaining gaps are edge cases (no position to close, partial-fill behavior) rather than core missing context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%: 'reason' is documented in the schema, but 'symbol' has no description anywhere. The prose clarifies scope ('in one symbol', closing the whole position rather than partially), which adds a little, but it does not compensate for the undocumented symbol parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('flatten the whole position in one symbol') and names the execution mechanism ('a reduce-only order that crosses the spread'), which implicitly distinguishes it from place_order. An agent can tell exactly what this does without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a concrete use condition: this is a risk-reducing action, so it remains permitted even when the daily loss limit has halted new trading. That is real routing guidance, though it never names place_order as the alternative for opening/increasing exposure, so the when-not-to-use side is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.