Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Signal MCP

Signal MCP

by R0MADEV
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Signal MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Pare

      emma10741
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP servers that wrap common developer tools such as git, npm, Docker, Kubernetes, and test runners, returning schema-validated structured JSON instead of raw terminal text. This lets AI agents consume typed, token-efficient results directly without brittle string parsing or platform-dependent formatting issues.
      5 npm
      MIT

    • GenZ MCP Server

      petems
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A streamlined MCP server that provides essential AI-powered tools for interactive development chat and systematic root cause analysis. It supports multiple AI providers to help developers brainstorm technical solutions and perform evidence-based debugging.
      -

    • smart-context-mcp

      Arrayo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that reduces AI agent token usage by up to 90% through intelligent context compression. Enables efficient code exploration, multi-file refactoring, and debugging by providing tools for smart reading, searching, and managing code context.
      4
      MIT

    • Pare

      Grant02807
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP servers that wrap developer tools like git, npm, Docker, and test runners, returning schema-validated, token-efficient JSON so agents can use structured data directly.
      5 npm
      MIT

    • Pare

      Dave-London
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP servers that wrap common developer tools (git, npm, docker, etc.) returning structured JSON output, enabling AI agents to reliably interact with these tools without parsing fragile terminal text.
      5 npm
      140
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    All tool descriptions are identical unavailable messages, so disambiguation relies solely on names. start_check/start_checks and run_check/run_checks are ambiguous in scope, and start vs. run overlap heavily, making it difficult for an agent to choose the correct intent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use lowercase snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (list_checks, get_run_status, diff_runs). Minor inconsistencies exist between singular/plural variants (start_check vs. start_checks) and synonymous verbs (start/run), but the overall pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is within the ideal 3-15 range for a check/run management server. Each name suggests a distinct operational purpose, and the count feels appropriately scoped without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle of checks and runs: listing, starting, running, status, summaries, diffs, logs, and reruns. The only notable gap is the absence of a cancel/stop or delete operation, which is a minor missing action for a management toolset.

    Resources