route-verdict-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGENT_KEY_FILE | No | Path to a file containing the EVM private key used to sign x402 payment authorizations. Alternative to AGENT_PRIVATE_KEY. | |
| AGENT_PRIVATE_KEY | No | EVM private key (0x...) of a wallet holding USDC on Base, used locally to sign the x402 EIP-3009 authorization for paid calls. Alternative to AGENT_KEY_FILE. Without a signer configured the tool never pays. | |
| ROUTE_VERDICT_URL | No | Service base URL override (default: production). | |
| ROUTE_VERDICT_MAX_AMOUNT_UNITS | No | Spend guard per call in USDC micro-units (default 50000 = $0.05, the known price). The client refuses to sign anything priced above it. | 50000 |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| route_checkA | Audit an x402 endpoint's trust and liveness before paying or relying on it. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With a single tool there is no possibility of confusion or misselection. The purpose (audit an x402 endpoint before paying) is clearly articulated and distinct from anything else in the surface.
The lone tool, route_check, follows a clean verb_noun (domain_verb) pattern that is readable and predictable. There are no competing conventions to clash with.
One tool is thin for a server, even a narrowly scoped one; it maps to a single paid endpoint, so a minimal surface is defensible, but agents have no complementary operations (e.g. batch check, fetch cached verdict without paying) to work with.
The tool returns a rich, self-contained result (verdict, score, deductions, live probe, terms, catalog presence, diff vs. last check), which covers the core audit workflow well. Minor gaps exist: no way to retrieve a prior verdict without a new paid call, and no batch or list operations.