QuestLaw Library MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to QuestLaw Library MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides read-only search and context-pack creation over a local source library, letting AI assistants retrieve relevant excerpts and audit cited quotations.20MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to browse, search, and retrieve papers from a local research library with read-only access, supporting multiple formats and automatic indexing.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving ChatGPT and Claude conversation exports locally, allowing assistants to fetch handoff context and continue conversations through read-only MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to search, read, and navigate a local Obsidian vault privately, with read-only tools for discovery, evidence reading, backlinks, and vault statistics.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude to search locally indexed exported chat history and project docs, retrieving full messages and conversation IDs via full-text search.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables assistants to explore a Readest library read-only, searching EPUB/PDF text, highlights, bookmarks and personal notes and reading back passages with book, chapter/page and revision references. It works against either Readest Cloud or a saved local library, with optional local semantic and hybrid search.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
The set has three clusters of near-neighbors: four search tools (search_cases, search_quotes, search_library, find_citation_mentions), three listing tools (list_cases, list_project_cases, and search_cases with an omitted query), and three retrieval tools (get_case, get_source_text, read_library_text). The descriptions do explicitly cross-reference each other and state when to prefer one over another, which prevents outright misselection, but the boundaries require careful reading rather than being self-evident from names.
Nearly all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_cases, search_quotes, get_source_text, reload_snapshot, find_citation_mentions). The only deviation is library_overview, a noun-only name, which is a minor break in an otherwise predictable convention.
Eleven tools is comfortably within a well-scoped range for a research library covering discovery, search, retrieval, and reading. There is mild redundancy from the parallel search and list variants, but each has a stated distinct job, so nothing feels padded.
The read path is thorough: overview, enumeration, three search granularities, previews, full source text, and snapshot reload. However, the surface is read-only — there is no way to add or update authorities, notes, quotations, tags, or project filings, so an agent cannot complete any write-side lifecycle and must fall back to the user.