Skip to main content
Glama
QuantumFabricIndustries

phantom-snare

Related Servers

Alternatives to phantom-snare

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools to scan text and URLs for prompt injection attacks, protecting AI agents from adversarial inputs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables sub-millisecond pre-execution safety filtering for AI agent tool calls, blocking destructive shell commands, dangerous SQL mutations, credential access, SSRF, and scope-creep or prompt-injection patterns before they execute, with optional fail-closed transparent proxy wrapping for any MCP server.
      6
      55 npm
      11
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A defensive gateway and firewall for AI agents using MCP servers, scanning tool calls, responses, and manifests for prompt injection, secrets, dangerous commands, and drift before allowing execution.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic detection and neutralization of adversarial prompt injections and override attempts in AI agent workflows via a zero-dependency MCP server, providing structured telemetry and low-latency validation.
      8
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables safe use of any MCP server by proxying and live-scanning all tool requests and responses, blocking or redacting poison descriptions, indirect prompt injection, malicious arguments, and unauthorized destinations.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables active deception for AI agents by injecting decoy honeypot tools that detect indirect prompt injection attempts, instantly terminate hostile sessions, and seal cryptographic incident evidence.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap in purpose: list_directory and list_files both explore the filesystem, and create_file and write_file both handle file creation/overwriting. The remaining tools are distinct enough, but the boundaries between these filesystem tools are ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern like read_file, delete_file, create_file, and get_user_info. Minor deviations exist: web_search is object-verb rather than verb-object, and database_query reads more like a noun phrase than query_database.

    Tool Count4/5

    Eleven tools is within a reasonable range and not bloated. However, the tools span unrelated domains—filesystem, web, code execution, email, database, and user info—so the count feels broad rather than tightly scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The filesystem tools have decent CRUD coverage, but database_query only supports queries, get_user_info only retrieves data, and there are no update/rename/copy operations for files. The surface is shallow in each mini-domain, and the duplicate create_file/write_file pair suggests an incomplete or muddled design.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues