Skip to main content
Glama
Quality-Max

QualityMax QA MCP

Official
by Quality-Max

Scan URL

scan_url

Inspect a URL with outbound browser and HTTP network requests for console errors, links, accessibility, Core Web Vitals, SEO, security headers, cookie and tracker privacy, mixed content, and page weight.

Instructions

Inspect a URL with outbound browser and HTTP network requests for console errors, links, accessibility, Core Web Vitals, SEO, security headers, cookie and tracker privacy, mixed content, and page weight. storageStatePath may name a workspace-relative Playwright storage-state file so the checks can run on an authenticated page; its credentials are loaded into the throwaway browser context and never returned. Because returned findings may reflect private content, authenticated scans also require acknowledgePrivateContent:true as explicit caller consent. This may write a local screenshot artifact when screenshot:true. Set format:"markdown" for a shareable graded report, or format:"issue" to render each finding as a self-contained ticket block (summary, steps, expected, actual, environment) ready to paste into a tracker; minSeverity filters that export. baseline takes a previous scan result, or a workspace-relative path to one, and adds a delta reporting which findings are new, fixed, and unchanged — use it to answer whether a change introduced anything rather than comparing two results by eye. allowPrivateNetwork:true is limited to deliberate loopback development targets.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYes
checksNo
formatNo
baselineNo
maxLinksNo
viewportNo
screenshotNo
minSeverityNo
weightBudgetNo
storageStatePathNo
allowPrivateNetworkNo
acknowledgePrivateContentNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changedv0.9.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / acknowledgePrivateContent
      Added value: +{
      +  "const": true,
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / baseline
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  ]
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / checks / items / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "console",
      +  "links",
      +  "accessibility",
      +  "performance",
      +  "seo",
      +  "security_headers",
      +  "cookies",
      +  "mixed_content",
      +  "weight"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / format / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "json",
      -  "markdown"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "json",
      +  "markdown",
      +  "issue"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / minSeverity
      Added value: +{
      +  "enum": [
      +    "critical",
      +    "high",
      +    "medium",
      +    "low",
      +    "info"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / storageStatePath
      Added value: +{
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observedv0.4.2

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses side effects and sensitive behavior beyond the annotations: outbound network activity, auth credentials loaded into a throwaway context and never returned, explicit consent requirement, possible screenshot artifact, and loopback restriction on allowPrivateNetwork. Consistent with readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true, and idempotentHint=false; no contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Long but front-loaded and information-dense; every sentence adds operational value for a 12-parameter tool. The length is justified by the tool's complexity, and there is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers authentication, privacy, output formats, baselines, and side effects, which is strong for a tool with no output schema. It is not flawless: three parameters are left unexplained and the default/JSON return shape is not described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates well by explaining format values, baseline behavior, minSeverity, storageStatePath, acknowledgePrivateContent, allowPrivateNetwork, and screenshot. However, maxLinks, viewport, and weightBudget have no explanatory text in either the schema or description, leaving a small but real gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: it inspects a URL via outbound browser and HTTP requests, and enumerates the exact categories of checks. This clearly identifies it as a scanner rather than the sibling playwright repro/page-inspection tools, so an agent can select it without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete context for non-obvious options: markdown for shareable reports, issue for tracker tickets, baseline for change-introduced findings, and acknowledgePrivateContent for authenticated scans. It does not explicitly contrast scan_url with sibling tools or state when not to use it, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.