Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to QoutaMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Analyzes codebases to generate dependency graphs and architectural insights across multiple programming languages, helping developers understand code structure and validate against architectural rules.
      6
      37 npm
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive code analysis including quality assessment, security vulnerability detection, refactoring suggestions, complexity calculations, and automatic documentation generation for multiple programming languages.
      5
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and developers to analyze code for language-specific best practices and idiomatic patterns across programming languages, CI automation, and configuration formats.
      16
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools have mostly distinct purposes: detect_stack is for quick tech stack detection, inspect_project provides a comprehensive analysis, and list_key_files focuses on categorizing key files. However, there is some overlap between detect_stack and inspect_project, as both involve analyzing project components, which could cause mild confusion about when to use each.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (detect_stack, inspect_project, list_key_files), using snake_case throughout. The verbs (detect, inspect, list) are clear and descriptive, making the naming predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 3 tools, the count is reasonable for a project analysis server, covering key aspects like tech detection, detailed inspection, and file listing. It is slightly lean but well-scoped, as each tool serves a distinct function without unnecessary bloat, though a few more tools might enhance coverage.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers analysis and listing functions well, but there are notable gaps for a project management domain. For example, it lacks tools for modifying or updating projects (e.g., add_dependency, update_config), which could limit agent workflows. The surface is functional for inspection but incomplete for broader project operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues