Umi-OCR MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Umi-OCR MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA lightweight MCP stdio server that enables LLM agents to invoke the MiMo Vision model for local image understanding and OCR via the OpenCode API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables analysis of local images through Kimi (Moonshot AI) vision models via the MCP protocol, supporting features like OCR and long context understanding.37 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes local LM Studio language models as MCP tools, enabling chat completions and model listing through a local OpenAI-compatible API without requiring API keys.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that exposes Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 vision model as an inspect_image tool, enabling AI agents to analyze images with structured JSON output including OCR, visual evidence, and normalized coordinates.15 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables any MCP client to perform image understanding and OCR via any OpenAI-compatible vision-language model. Supports local, private inference without images leaving the machine.213 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceWraps Baidu's Unlimited-OCR model as MCP tools for Claude Code, enabling unlimited local OCR without API costs, supporting images and multi-page documents.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Tools are mostly distinct: OCR methods target different input types (file, base64, PDF, batch, directory). The two status-check tools serve different granularities (detailed vs quick), but their overlap could cause slight confusion despite clear descriptions.
Naming is inconsistent: some tools use 'ocr_' prefix (ocr_batch, ocr_directory), others use different patterns (check_ocr_status, quick_ocr_status, extract_text_umi_v2). The 'extract_text_umi_v2' name includes a version suffix, breaking convention.
With 7 tools, the set is well-scoped for an OCR server. Each tool has a clear role: status checks, single-image OCR from various sources, batch, and directory scanning. No unnecessary tools.
Covers the main OCR workflow: status check, single image from file/base64/PDF, batch, and directory. Minor gaps like multi-page PDF OCR or clipboard input are absent but not critical for the core use case.