Skip to main content
Glama

Get Server Information

get-server-info
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve details about the MCP Firebird server and its available tools to discover capabilities and plan secure database operations.

Instructions

Gets information about the Firebird MCP server and its available tools

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoFailure information; present when success is false
resultNoThe legacy JSON payload; present for completed operations and partial batches
successYesFalse for tool failures, including partially failed batches

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv2.12.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$defs": {
      +    "__schema0": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "items": {
      +            "$ref": "#/$defs/__schema0"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "additionalProperties": {
      +            "$ref": "#/$defs/__schema0"
      +          },
      +          "propertyNames": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "type": "object"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "error": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Failure information; present when success is false",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "details": {
      +          "additionalProperties": {
      +            "$ref": "#/$defs/__schema0"
      +          },
      +          "propertyNames": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "message": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "message",
      +        "type"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "result": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "The legacy JSON payload; present for completed operations and partial batches",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "capabilities": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "features": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "tools": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "totalTools": {
      +              "type": "number"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "tools",
      +            "totalTools",
      +            "features"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "description": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "runtime": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "memoryUsage": {
      +              "additionalProperties": {
      +                "type": "number"
      +              },
      +              "propertyNames": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "object"
      +            },
      +            "nodeVersion": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "platform": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "uptime": {
      +              "type": "number"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "nodeVersion",
      +            "platform",
      +            "uptime",
      +            "memoryUsage"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "version": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "name",
      +        "version",
      +        "description",
      +        "capabilities",
      +        "runtime"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "description": "False for tool failures, including partially failed batches",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  3. First observed

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is fully covered without the description. The description adds only the scope of what is returned (server info plus available tools), and with an output schema present the return shape needn't be restated. Adequate but thin.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and resource and contains no filler. Nothing could be cut without losing meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a read-only annotation set and an output schema, the description doesn't need to explain returns, and zero params keep the call trivial. The remaining gap is disambiguation from the overlapping tool-listing and server-info siblings, which the description does not address.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. Schema coverage is irrelevant here since the schema is empty.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('Gets information about') and a specific resource ('the Firebird MCP server and its available tools'), so the agent knows exactly what the tool returns. However, it offers no differentiation from close siblings such as list-available-tools, get-tool-help, get-database-info, or system-health-check, which all plausibly return server/tool information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to call this versus the several siblings that also surface tool/server information (list-available-tools, get-tool-help, get-database-info, system-health-check). Usage must be inferred entirely from the name, which is a real risk in a 31-tool server.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.