Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to lambdacad-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables natural-language control of AutoCAD via file IPC or headless DXF generation, with tools for drawing, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID, views, and system operations.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AutoCAD LT automation and headless DXF generation, exposing tools for drawing, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID, and view operations via natural language.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server enabling AI-driven CAD automation for SolidWorks at the feature level, converting intent into CAD-neutral IR and compiling it into concrete operations. It provides engineering-semantic tools and a deterministic compiler, bridging any MCP-capable AI client to SolidWorks via COM.
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges Claude with AutoCAD, enabling to generate architectural floor plans, draw geometry, and export DXF files just by describing what you need in natural language.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for read-only inspection of AutoCAD DWG files, enabling AI agents to open drawings, query objects by handle or filter, and explore properties and references.
      9
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 128 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Almost every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and descriptions often explicitly contrast related tools (e.g., rotate_3d vs rotate_entity, hatch_circle vs hatch_islands). With 128 tools there are some potentially confusable pairs like get_entity_counts vs drawing_info, but the detailed explanations resolve most ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is largely consistent, with clear families such as draw_*, solid_*, bool_*, list_*, get_*, set_*, and assembly_*. Minor deviations like 'regen', 'leader', 'polygon', and the mixed bool/boolean (bool_union vs boolean_verified) prevent a perfect score.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 128 tools, this is an extreme outlier for an MCP server. Even for a broad CAD domain, the surface is overwhelming and far exceeds the 3-15 tool guideline, making tool selection costly and impractical for agents.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers virtually every CAD operation: 2D drafting, 3D solids, editing, dimensions, layers, blocks, viewports, sheets, exports, rendering, analysis (interference, holes, overhang), assembly management, graph analysis, and a memory system. There are no obvious dead ends, and run_command/run_lisp fill any hypothetical gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues