A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceProvides tools to predict Dutch court case outcomes with probabilities, retrieve benchmark statistics, and check legal texts for outcome leakage.
Apache 2.0
rechtspraak-mcp
by Prudai
Related Servers
Alternatives to rechtspraak-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and retrieving legal texts and decisions from French public APIs Légifrance and JudiLibre for legal research.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving full-text UK court judgments and tribunal decisions from The National Archives' Find Case Law service by subject, party, judge, or neutral citation.260 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides access to Swiss court decisions through the entscheidsuche.ch API, enabling search, retrieval, and analysis of legal documents across different cantons and courts using natural language queries.-
LexAPI MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying EU legal documents, case law, and citation graphs through natural language using the LexAPI.1044 npm3MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching Scottish court and tribunal judgments from the SCTS index, retrieving case metadata and verifying that judgment PDFs are reachable.247 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search returns summaries with facets, get returns full text by ECLI, bulk variants handle multiple ECLIs, list_waardelijsten provides filter vocabulary, and lido_related maps citations. Even the overlap between search_uitspraken and get_uitspraak when given an ECLI is unambiguous because one returns a summary and the other full text.
Naming Consistency4/5
The set predominantly follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (search_*, get_*, list_*) with a uniform _bulk suffix for batch operations. The sole deviation is 'lido_related', which uses a noun-adjective form instead of a verb, but it is still clear and does not disrupt overall predictability.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is well-scoped for a case law search and retrieval server. Each tool serves a distinct aspect: searching, fetching, bulk operations, value lists, and citation analysis, with no redundancy or glaring omissions.
Completeness4/5
The server covers the core workflow: discover filter values, search for summaries, retrieve full texts, bulk-fetch multiple decisions, and explore citations. Minor gaps like lack of search by case number or free-text search are noted, but the official API does not support these, so the surface is appropriate.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues