PromStack MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to PromStack MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Zed) to llmsproxy.ai, exposing chat, coding, and retrieval capabilities as MCP tools, resources, and prompts.6 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI clients to connect to example tools, resources, and prompts over MCP, demonstrating integration with IDEs, chatbots, and agent frameworks.-

Enkrypt AI MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates AI safety analysis, red-teaming, and prompt auditing directly into MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor IDE, allowing real-time analysis of prompts and detection of jailbreak attempts.283Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP gateway that lets you write Python functions and register them as skills to be used as tools by any MCP-compatible client like Claude Desktop or Claude API.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables running Claude Skills locally on your Mac with sandboxed execution, supporting document processing and integration with MCP-compatible AI tools while ensuring data privacy.451Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables all IDEs to access Claude Code Skills capabilities with skill discovery, search, and management tools.24MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
The tools have distinct names but their purposes are unclear due to missing descriptions, making it hard to assess true overlap. 'list_prompts' and 'select_prompt' might overlap in functionality, while 'query_context' and 'get_prompt' could be ambiguous without context. The lack of descriptions forces reliance on naming alone, which introduces uncertainty.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, such as 'export_skill', 'get_prompt', and 'list_prompts'. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to parse for an agent.
With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a server focused on prompts and skills, as inferred from the names. It's slightly lean but not overly sparse, suggesting a well-scoped set that could cover core operations without being overwhelming.
Inferred domain involves managing prompts and skills, but the tool set lacks clear CRUD coverage—there's no 'create_prompt', 'update_prompt', or 'delete_prompt', and 'export_skill' stands alone without complementary tools. The missing descriptions exacerbate gaps, making it likely agents will encounter dead ends in workflows.