Skip to main content
Glama
ProSuite

prosuite-mcp

Official
by ProSuite

Related Servers

Alternatives to prosuite-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Geopera geospatial data platform that enables AI agents to discover imagery, place and manage orders, and run analytics using the same API as other Geopera clients.
      100
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to directly control QGIS for tasks like layer management, feature editing, and map rendering. It provides a suite of 50 tools to execute processing algorithms and manage GIS projects through natural language commands.
      118
      297
      GPL 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects Large Language Models to the GeoServer REST API, enabling AI assistants to query and manipulate geospatial data through natural language.
      9
      89
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes GeoServer REST API functionality for natural language interaction through AI assistants like Claude, VS Code Copilot, and other MCP-compatible clients.
      BSD 2-Clause "Simplified"
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that makes official UAE open data queryable through natural language, offering tools for source discovery, dataset search, spatial joins, and intelligence recipes.
      10 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: listing/describing conditions versus describing/searching/loading specs versus running verifications. However, run_verification and run_xml_verification both execute verifications and could be confused if an agent doesn't carefully read the parameter differences, and preview_condition_run partially overlaps with run_verification.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_conditions, describe_condition, describe_spec, search_spec, load_spec, add_condition_to_spec, run_verification, preview_condition_run, run_xml_verification. The only slight outlier is preview_condition_run, but it still fits the pattern well.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose. Each tool addresses a distinct stage in the QA workflow—discovery, spec management, ad-hoc running, and XML-based running—without unnecessary bulk or gaps that would require extra tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core lifecycle: listing conditions, describing them, loading/describing/searching specs, previewing condition additions, and running verifications (both ad-hoc and XML). The main gaps are the lack of a persistent save/update operation for specs (add_condition_to_spec only previews) and no tool for retrieving past verification results or reports.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive