Skip to main content
Glama
Praroop1435

Airtable Full-Stack MCP

by Praroop1435
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Airtable Full-Stack MCP

Related Servers

  • Airtable MCP Server

    felores
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for programmatically managing Airtable bases, tables, fields, and records through Claude Desktop or other MCP clients.
    12
    217 npm
    75
    MIT

  • Effect Airtable MCP Server

    glassBead-tc
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A production-ready MCP server for Airtable that enables programmatic management of bases, tables, fields, and records through Claude Desktop or other MCP clients using Effect for type-safe and robust API interactions.
    3 npm
    1
    MIT

  • airtable-mcp-server

    domdomegg
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that provides read and write access to Airtable databases. This server enables LLMs to inspect database schemas, then read and write records.
    1,682 npm
    458
    TypeScript
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 14 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Tools are cleanly partitioned by domain (records, schema, webhooks, automation scripts, Interface Designer), and the 'When NOT to Use' sections strongly reinforce boundaries. The only mild risks are pairs like manage_records vs batch_upsert and set_field_permissions vs configure_detail_sheet, but these are clearly distinguished in practice.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools share an 'airtable_' prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern, which is predictable. Minor deviations include 'airtable_batch_upsert' omitting an explicit object and the broad 'manage' verb used for both records and webhooks.

Tool Count5/5

At 14 tools, this is within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool earns its place across distinct sub-domains: record operations, schema management, webhooks, automation script generation, and interface design. The count feels appropriate for a 'full-stack' Airtable server.

Completeness3/5

Record CRUD and webhook lifecycles are well covered, but schema tools lack delete operations and Interface Designer tools provide no way to list or delete existing pages. These are notable gaps for a server claiming full-stack coverage and may require manual UI workarounds.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources