No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: compare_runs compares two specific runs, get_aggregate_stats provides cross-run statistics, get_eval_summary gives detailed metadata for a single run, get_sample retrieves granular sample data, list_logs enumerates available logs, and search_logs filters logs by criteria. The descriptions clearly differentiate their scopes, making misselection unlikely.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'tool_' prefix (e.g., tool_compare_runs, tool_get_aggregate_stats). The verbs are descriptive and appropriate for their functions (compare, get, list, search), and the nouns precisely indicate the target resources (runs, stats, summary, sample, logs). This consistency aids predictability and usability.
With 6 tools, this server is well-scoped for inspecting evaluation logs. The count aligns with the domain's needs: listing and searching logs, retrieving summaries and samples, comparing runs, and aggregating statistics. Each tool earns its place without redundancy, covering essential operations without being overwhelming or insufficient.
The toolset provides complete coverage for log inspection: list_logs and search_logs for discovery, get_eval_summary and get_sample for detailed analysis, compare_runs for comparison, and get_aggregate_stats for cross-run insights. There are no obvious gaps; agents can navigate from discovery to deep analysis seamlessly, supporting typical evaluation workflows.