get_work_item
Retrieve a work item from Azure DevOps by providing its ID. Use this to access task details, bugs, or user stories directly.
Instructions
Get a work item by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Work item ID |
Retrieve a work item from Azure DevOps by providing its ID. Use this to access task details, bugs, or user stories directly.
Get a work item by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Work item ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and no description of behavior (e.g., read-only, error handling, returned data shape). The agent lacks critical context for a mutation vs query tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (one sentence). While efficient, it omits helpful details that could be added without significant bloat.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description fails to mention return format, error cases, or required permissions, leaving gaps for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with a minimal description for 'id'. The tool description adds no new information beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool gets a work item by ID. It differentiates from siblings like query_work_items (search) and get_pr (different resource), but does not explicitly contrast them.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like query_work_items or get_work_item_relations. The agent must infer from context signals.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/PraiseSinkamba/az-devops-cli-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server