Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Apier MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive access to the Norwegian Business Registry API for querying company information, board members, subsidiaries, organizational data, and voluntary organizations. Provides real-time access to over 1 million registered Norwegian entities with detailed corporate structure and governance data.
      15
      9 npm
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query Norwegian tax data, submit reports, look up population register information, and validate VAT returns through Skatteetaten APIs using Maskinporten authentication.
      52
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to Norway's official business registry for searching companies, looking up organizational details, and identifying company roles and sub-units. It utilizes data from Brønnøysundregistrene to enable detailed queries by industry, municipality, or organization number.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the Norwegian Business Registry (Brønnøysundregistrene) API to search and retrieve detailed information about Norwegian companies, subunits, roles, organization forms, municipalities, and NACE industry codes.
      18
      9 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive Norwegian business intelligence through Brønnøysund and Statistics Norway APIs, enabling company search, financial analysis, ownership mapping, market research, and automated financial data extraction.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tool set has several clusters of near-duplicate functionality: get_company_profile/get_company_context/get_company_summary all return overlapping identity slices, and four tools (check_authorization, check_fullmakt, list_acting_capacity, get_company_authority) cover similar authority/delegation territory with subtle boundary differences. Although the descriptions include extensive cross-references, an agent must read very carefully to avoid misselection, and the get_company_summary tool deliberately duplicates the output of get_company_obligations and get_company_deadlines.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names are consistently lower_snake_case verb_noun constructions, with a strong get_company_* group and a coherent check/request/revoke_fullmakt lifecycle. Minor deviations like validate_action, explain_compliance_error, and redeem_issuance_token introduce different verb styles, but the overall pattern remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools, this sits at the top of the 'heavy but borderline' range. The domain is broad enough to justify many tools, but overlapping company-intelligence and authority tools (profile/context/summary, verification/authority, check_authorization/check_fullmakt) suggest consolidation could reduce the count without losing coverage.

    Completeness2/5

    The read-side compliance surface (obligations, deadlines, registry, authority, filing history) is thorough, but the set references submit_vat_return and /v1/actions/execute without exposing any tool to actually execute a filing. This is a significant dead end: validate_action can preflight a submission, but the promised live submission path is absent, which will cause agent failures in any workflow that needs to file.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive