Skip to main content
Glama
Polsia-Inc

twitter-read

by Polsia-Inc

search_tweets

Search tweets by query and retrieve engagement metrics to measure performance, track mentions, and analyze replies.

Instructions

Search for tweets matching a query and return results with engagement metrics

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesSearch query string (supports Twitter search operators)
max_resultsNoMaximum number of tweets to return (10-100, default: 10)
start_timeNoISO 8601 date string for earliest tweet (e.g., 2026-01-20T00:00:00Z)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Lacks details on rate limits, pagination, or search archive type. Only mentions returning engagement metrics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single concise sentence (12 words) front-loads the core action and output. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, description is too brief. Missing return format, pagination info, and any usage context for a search tool with 3 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 3 parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). Description adds no extra meaning beyond what schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it searches tweets matching a query and returns engagement metrics. Differentiates from siblings like get_mentions and get_replies by focusing on general search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings or alternatives. Does not mention context for search vs. mentions/replies.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Polsia-Inc/twitter-read-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server