Skip to main content
Glama
Polarts

fs-mcp

by Polarts
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to fs-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • LocalFS MCP Server

      mcp-bridge
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides sandboxed access to local filesystem operations including directory and file management, content search with glob and regex patterns, and binary file support with configurable safety limits.
      -

    • Local File Management MCP

      IdoY12
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables file system operations such as listing, reading, and creating files within a scoped local project directory. It provides a secure way to manage local files through standardized MCP tools built with FastMCP.
      -

    • Filesystem MCP

      domdomegg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables reading, creating, and editing files on the local filesystem through operations like view, create, string replacement, and line insertion.
      78 npm
      3
      MIT

    • mcplocal

      aiautotool
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local Files MCP server that lets MCP-compatible clients read, search, and modify files inside a sandboxed directory. Provides file management and coding workflow tools with security controls like path boundary enforcement and disabled deletion by default.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct filesystem operation: listing, reading, creating, editing, deleting, and searching. There is no meaningful overlap between grep and read_file, or between create_file and edit_file, so an agent can reliably select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: explore_filesystem, edit_file, create_file, delete_file, read_file. The one exception is 'grep', which is a conventional command name but slightly breaks the verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped set for a filesystem server. Each tool covers a distinct core operation without redundancy or bloat, fitting comfortably within the ideal 3-15 tool range.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the full basic lifecycle: list, read, create, edit, delete, and search. Minor gaps exist such as rename/move and file metadata/stat operations, but these can be worked around with existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources