Skip to main content
Glama
Polar3D

Polar Cloud MCP

Official
by Polar3D

Related Servers

Alternatives to Polar Cloud MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to submit, slice, and start 3D prints with configurable gates, preview approval, and monitoring, via a self-hosted print daemon.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with 3D printer management systems through an MCP server, supporting STL file manipulation, slicing, and control of printers like OctoPrint, Klipper, Duet, and more.
      30
      186 npm
      251
      GPL 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to inspect FreeCAD documents and export named solids to STL, find and derive OrcaSlicer presets, preview and run slices with recorded manifests, and then read G-code metadata, query a Moonraker printer, upload G-code, and start an uploaded print as a separate confirmed step.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to monitor and control a Bambu Lab P1S printer over the local network, including status, file management, slicing, and print operations.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes MCP tools that slice models with headless OrcaSlicer, stage gcode on Moonraker-based Klipper printers, gate job starts behind explicit operator authorization, and report status, telemetry-derived events, snapshots, and alerts. It also manages spools and lets AI agents query job estimates, blockers, and start-precondition checks.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage multiple 3D printers via MCP, including monitoring temperatures and progress, uploading and slicing models, controlling prints, and viewing cameras.
      8 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Personal and school contexts are cleanly separated, and within each context, operations like listing, uploading, slicing, and approving are unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names start with a verb and use snake_case, which is consistent. Minor deviations like 'preview_plate' (verb+noun) and 'slice_and_queue' (compound verb) are still readable and follow the overall pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well-scoped for a 3D printing cloud server covering both personal and educational workflows. Each tool addresses a specific need without redundancy.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set covers model generation/upload, slicing, and queuing, but lacks critical lifecycle operations: there is no way to list queued jobs, cancel a job, or start a print. Agents cannot fully execute a print workflow, leaving dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues