Skip to main content
Glama
Polar3D

Polar Cloud MCP

Official
by Polar3D
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Polar Cloud MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • printd

      riverray121
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to submit, slice, and start 3D prints with configurable gates, preview approval, and monitoring, via a self-hosted print daemon.
      MIT

    • MCP 3D Printer Server

      DMontgomery40
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with 3D printer management systems through an MCP server, supporting STL file manipulation, slicing, and control of printers like OctoPrint, Klipper, Duet, and more.
      87 npm
      237
      GPL 2.0

    • bambu-p1s-mcp

      marctheshark3
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to monitor and control a Bambu Lab P1S printer over the local network, including status, file management, slicing, and print operations.
      11
      MIT

    • 3d-printagent

      huy97
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage multiple 3D printers via MCP, including monitoring temperatures and progress, uploading and slicing models, controlling prints, and viewing cameras.
      112 npm
      MIT

    • fabtally-mcp

      zvmzaretsky
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for real FDM 3D-printing slicing, quoting, and design-for-manufacturability analysis via the FabTally API, supporting 12 printer profiles and 12 materials. Includes free discovery/printability tools and paid slice/quote/orientation tools settled via x402 (USDC on Base).
      6
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Personal and school contexts are cleanly separated, and within each context, operations like listing, uploading, slicing, and approving are unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names start with a verb and use snake_case, which is consistent. Minor deviations like 'preview_plate' (verb+noun) and 'slice_and_queue' (compound verb) are still readable and follow the overall pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well-scoped for a 3D printing cloud server covering both personal and educational workflows. Each tool addresses a specific need without redundancy.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set covers model generation/upload, slicing, and queuing, but lacks critical lifecycle operations: there is no way to list queued jobs, cancel a job, or start a print. Agents cannot fully execute a print workflow, leaving dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources