register_account

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It discloses that no KYC/OTP is involved and that a Bearer token is returned, but does not mention side effects, idempotency, password policies, or potential failures—moderate transparency for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that packs in the action, programmatic nature, no-KYC/OTP detail, and return type. Every word earns its place; no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with only two required parameters and no output schema, the description covers the key aspects: what it does, the key behavioral trait of skipping KYC/OTP, and the return value. It lacks explicit permission/safety details but is otherwise complete for an account registration tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with both parameters clearly described (email with no verification, password). The description adds no additional parameter-specific detail beyond confirming the absence of human verification, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Create' and resource 'EQVPS account', and specifies the programmatic nature with no human/KYC/OTP step. This distinguishes it from siblings like login and reset_password by making the account-creation purpose explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides context that this is for programmatic account creation without human verification, which implies when to use it over login or other account management tools. However, it does not explicitly name alternative tools or state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.