list_buckets
List all buckets in a plan by providing the plan ID.
Instructions
List all buckets in a plan
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| planId | Yes | Plan ID (use list_plans to find ID) |
List all buckets in a plan by providing the plan ID.
List all buckets in a plan
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| planId | Yes | Plan ID (use list_plans to find ID) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, if there are pagination limits, or any side effects. It simply states 'list all buckets' without behavioral details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with one sentence and no unnecessary words, appropriate for a simple list operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., list of bucket objects, IDs). It lacks completeness for an agent to understand the full outcome.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('list') and resource ('buckets'), and the context of 'in a plan' distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_plans or create_bucket.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The schema hints to use list_plans for the planId, but the description itself lacks explicit usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Plong-Wasin/planner-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server