batch_analyze

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must carry burden. Mentions 'Aggregates findings' and 'token savings', but fails to disclose safety (read-only?), error handling, or whether modifications occur. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences, front-loaded with purpose. No superfluous words. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description must hint at return. 'Aggregates findings' is vague. With nested options and 3 parameters, description could clarify output format or behavior. Adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 67% (2 of 3 parameters documented). Description adds 'glob patterns' and 'files' but no extra nuance beyond schema. Options object is detailed in schema but not expanded in description. Minimal compensation for coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Batch File Analysis', verb 'analyze', resource 'multiple files using glob patterns', and mentions 'Aggregates findings'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'analyze_file' (single file) and 'batch_modify' (modify).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for multi-file analysis with token savings. Sibling names differentiate single-file vs batch, and analyze vs modify. Could explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives, but current context suffices.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.