Skip to main content
Glama
PlainTxtOffice

Plain Text Memory MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Plain Text Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides persistent knowledge graph memory for AI agents, enabling them to store, recall, and query facts about people, projects, and relationships across sessions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives AI coding agents persistent, branch-aware memory and a dependency-tracked task graph by storing decisions, lessons, and tasks as plain JSON and Markdown committed directly into the repository. Agents can record and fuzzy-search past decisions, dump instant project context, and create, claim, complete, and query tasks whose completion automatically unblocks downstream work.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to store, query, and update persistent project knowledge as a local, Git-friendly knowledge graph, providing structured memory across sessions.
      9
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides persistent long-term memory for AI coding agents by storing entities, relations, and observations across different sessions. It enables users to manage and query structured knowledge like coding preferences, project patterns, and technical solutions via a graph-based storage system.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding agents with git-native persistent memory and a dependency-aware task graph, letting them record and fuzzy-recall architectural decisions, lessons, and gotchas while creating, claiming, and completing tasks that auto-unblock downstream work. Stores everything as plain JSON and Markdown committed inside the repository, so context stays branch-aware, team-shared, and reviewable in pull requests.
      11 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and descriptions explicitly cross-reference related tools (e.g., 'to add facts to an existing entity, see add_observations') to prevent misuse. Boundary cases like edit_observation vs. add_observations vs. merge_entities are well delineated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a strict verb_noun pattern throughout (create_entities, add_observations, edit_observation, rename_entity, merge_entities, delete_entities, read_graph, search_nodes, open_nodes, etc.). The single exception, initialize_memory, is still verb_noun and clearly consistent with the rest.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools covering entity CRUD, relation CRUD, observation CRUD, querying, merging, renaming, initialization, and export, the count is well-scoped. Each tool earns its place; no redundant or trivially thin operations.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers full lifecycle operations for entities, relations, and observations, plus graph-level read/search, taxonomy export, and memory file initialization. No obvious dead ends; the domain of a plain-text knowledge graph is fully served.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues