Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
asterism-mcp

asterism-mcp

by Plaetorius
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to asterism-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP-scopus

      andri-setiawan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve real academic papers from Scopus, preventing citation hallucination by providing accurate paper metadata, author info, and citation analysis.
      15
      3
      MIT

    • Paper Chaser MCP

      joshuasundance-swca
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to conduct academic research workflows such as paper discovery, literature mapping, citation chasing, author pivots, citation repair, and regulatory or species document retrieval.
      MIT

    • ai-papers-mcp

      elpaca
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and reading of AI/ML papers from conference proceedings and arxiv, with tools for full-text search, table of contents, and content grep.
      4
      -

    • Phở Research Tools

      thaohienhomes
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify citations, check retractions, search papers, format bibliographies, run PRISMA 2020 screening, and find open datasets and research software using open databases.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three search tools (`search`, `search_works`, `search_tables`) could appear overlapping at a glance, but the descriptions explicitly scope each: full-text passages, titles/abstracts, and tables respectively, including guidance on when to pick which. Retrieval tools (`get_passage`, `get_table`, `paper`) target clearly distinct units (chunk, table, work), leaving no real ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set follows a mostly predictable scheme: `get_X` for fetch-by-id and `search_X`/`count_by_year` for querying, with snake_case throughout. Deviations are the bare `search` (which by analogy should be something like `search_passages`) and the noun-only `paper`, but both are still readable and unambiguous in context.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a literature-discovery server: three discovery modes, three retrieval modes, and one aggregation tool, each earning its place. Nothing feels padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core search-and-read lifecycle: discovery by abstract, full text, tables, or trend counts, plus retrieval of metadata, passages with context, and full tables. Gaps exist around citation/reference graph traversal and author- or venue-based browsing, but agents can work around these with the existing search tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources