F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides persistent task management capabilities for AI assistants, allowing them to create, update, and track tasks beyond their usual context limitations.
5
-
Agentic Tools MCP Server
by Pimzino
Related Servers
Alternatives to Agentic Tools MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing comprehensive task management capabilities with support for project organization, task tracking, and automatic PRD parsing into actionable items.37MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for AI agents to manage tasks and track progress across projects, with features like project isolation, search, and reporting.116 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for intelligent task management in AI-powered development environments, providing file-based storage, dependency management with cycle detection, and an interactive CLI.14 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA versatile Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to manage calendars, track tasks, handle emails, search the web, and control smart home devices.23-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for TaskTrek that enables AI assistants to manage tasks and projects programmatically via JSON file storage.7-
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 29 tools
Disambiguation3/5
The tools have clear purposes within a project/task management domain, but there is significant overlap between task and subtask operations (e.g., create_task vs. create_subtask, get_task vs. get_subtask), which could cause confusion. Descriptions help differentiate, but the boundaries are not entirely distinct.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g., create_task, delete_project, update_memory). All tools use snake_case, and the verb choices (create, delete, get, list, update, etc.) are predictable and aligned with CRUD operations.
Tool Count2/5
With 29 tools, the count feels excessive for a project/task management server. Many tools are redundant or overly granular (e.g., separate tools for tasks and subtasks), leading to a bloated interface that could overwhelm agents and reduce usability.
Completeness4/5
The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD coverage for core entities (projects, tasks, subtasks, memories) and includes advanced features like parsing PRDs and inferring progress. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for managing task dependencies beyond move_task, but overall coverage is robust.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues