A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server for comprehensive code analysis, navigation, and quality assessment across 25+ programming languages.
9
88
MIT
Tech Debt MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Tech Debt MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for analyzing GitHub pull requests, detecting security vulnerabilities, assessing code quality, and providing risk ratings across multiple languages.2 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA code quality analysis server that detects security vulnerabilities, deceptive patterns, incomplete code, and highlights good practices in source code for MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.3-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides code validation rules and analysis for various stacks/frameworks, enabling automated code reviews and reporting directly from VS Code and other editors.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides senior-level code review, quality checks, security analysis, and refactoring suggestions directly in your editor.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for automated architectural mapping, security vulnerability detection, ML asset tracking, and code metrics in local repositories.-
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct purpose. analyze_file vs analyze_project differ by scope. get_issues_by_category and get_issues_by_severity filter differently. Custom rule tools (add, remove, list, execute) are clearly separate actions. No overlapping functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case. Verbs like add, analyze, check, execute, get, list, remove, validate are used predictably. No mixing of conventions.
Tool Count4/5
16 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool serves a clear purpose for tech debt analysis. The count is reasonable for the domain and does not feel excessive.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers analysis, custom rules, metrics, filtering, recommendations, and config validation. Minor gaps: get_vulnerability_report is offline only (no actual CVE lookup), and there is no tool for tracking debt over time. Otherwise complete for its purpose.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessResponsive