Skip to main content
Glama
PhilippMT

Software Planning Tool

by PhilippMT
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Software Planning Tool

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Spec MCP Server

      karol-f
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Streamlines development workflows through AI-assisted codebase analysis, comprehensive planning, task breakdown with dependencies, and automated implementation verification. Enables systematic approach to complex development tasks like framework migrations and feature implementation.
      5
      10 npm
      MIT

    • SpecFlow MCP Server

      lyz530
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides an AI-driven four-stage software development workflow with role management, enabling structured requirements analysis, design, implementation, and testing.
      1
      MIT

    • handoff-mcp

      coladapo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage complex development workflows by creating structured handoffs between strategic planning and tactical implementation, with project management, task tracking, and intelligent scaffolding.
      7 npm
      MIT

    • DinCoder

      flight505
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Implements GitHub's Spec-Driven Development methodology, transforming natural language requirements into executable specifications, technical plans, and ordered task lists with contract-based validation and progress tracking.
      16 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. The tools cover specific actions like adding, getting, removing, updating status, saving, and starting planning, each targeting a unique operation in the planning workflow.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_todo, get_todos, remove_todo). The naming is uniform and predictable, using snake_case throughout without any deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the count is well-scoped for a software planning domain. Each tool earns its place by covering essential CRUD operations and session management, avoiding bloat or thinness.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for todo management (add, get, remove, update status) and includes session operations (start planning, save plan). There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose of software planning.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources