Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Philidor MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to assess the risk of crypto wallets, tokens, and smart contracts by providing read-only on-chain analysis, 0-100 risk scoring with explanations, fund tracing, and contract inspection before interaction.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only research on live Hyperliquid vaults through search, ranking, comparison, risk explanation, HLP metrics, and alert tools with timestamped evidence and caveats.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query live on-chain data from The Graph's decentralized network with built-in verification and computed risk insights for Uniswap V3 pools, such as swap counts, directional flow, and concentration signals.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      The verifiable risk engine for autonomous agents: deterministic, self-verifying financial calculations that an agent can delegate and prove. It covers liquidation and funding, position sizing and risk of ruin, options Greeks and margin, LP divergence, treasury concentration and depeg, execution quality checks, plus intelligence on options, DeFi, prediction markets, and transaction safety analysis.
      1 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Real-time DeFi analytics MCP server for AI agents. Provides token risk analysis, yield scanning, and wallet exposure checking across Base, Ethereum, and Arbitrum.
      3
      9 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific resources and actions in the DeFi vault domain, with no overlap that could cause confusion. For example, 'get_vault' retrieves detailed vault information, while 'get_vault_risk_breakdown' focuses specifically on risk metrics, and 'search_vaults' handles filtering and listing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as 'compare_vaults', 'explain_risk_score', and 'get_vault_risk_breakdown'. This predictable naming convention makes the tool set easy to navigate and understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for analyzing DeFi vaults, covering key aspects like risk assessment, market overview, and vault details. Each tool serves a unique function without redundancy, making the count appropriate for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for DeFi vault analysis, including CRUD-like operations (e.g., get, search, compare), risk explanation, market insights, and curator/protocol details. There are no obvious gaps that would hinder an agent from performing essential tasks in this domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive