dav-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dav-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTransform AI agents into orchestrating assistants managing calendars, contacts, and tasks via CalDAV, CardDAV, and VTODO protocols.232 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA privacy-first, local-first MCP server that provides 15 ADHD/second-brain tools for capturing, prioritizing, and resurfacing tasks with context from calendar, mail, and messages.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to read, schedule, update, and delete calendar events and tasks on a self-hosted CalDAV server, and to query availability for free/busy slots.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvider-agnostic CalDAV calendar MCP server that connects any CalDAV calendar to AI assistants, enabling calendar operations like listing, creating, updating, and deleting events.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA thin, privacy-respecting CalDAV toolkit that lets an LLM read and manage your calendars safely, with dry-run writes and role gating.PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants such as Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Cursor to a unified personal operating system, enabling them to track habits and streaks, manage task lifecycles and deadlines, and build syllabi and flashcard decks with FSRS-5 spaced-repetition scheduling through 102 typed tools. All reads and writes run against a single append-only event ledger over an OAuth 2.1-secured Streamable HTTP endpoint.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: list vs query vs multi-get vs create/update/delete, and raw update variants are explicitly differentiated from their field-based counterparts. Even overlapping tools like list_events and calendar_query are clearly scoped with warnings and usage guidance.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_, create_, update_, delete_, *_query, *_multi_get). The lone exception is make_calendar instead of create_calendar, which breaks the otherwise uniform create_* convention.
At 27 tools, the surface is heavy but defends its size by covering three distinct resource domains (calendars, todos, contacts) with full CRUD plus query and batch operations. It sits just above the 16-25 'heavy' band, yet all tools serve a concrete purpose rather than being redundant.
The calendar, event, todo, and contact domains have strong lifecycle coverage (list/query/get/create/update/delete), plus freebusy and raw updates. The main gap is the lack of addressbook creation/update/deletion—only list_addressbooks exists—but this is a minor limitation for the core workflows.