Pexafy MCP Server
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEXAFY_API_KEY | Yes | Fallback key (stdio/dev) | |
| MCP_RESOLVE_SECRET | No | Secret for resolving MCP resources | |
| PEXAFY_API_BASE_URL | No | Pexafy API root | http://localhost:8000 |
| PEXAFY_MCP_TRANSPORT | No | stdio or http | stdio |
| PEXAFY_THUMB_BASE_URL | No | Base URL for signed thumbnails | |
| PEXAFY_THUMB_HMAC_SECRET | No | HMAC secret for signed thumbnails |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| logging | {} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| extensions | {
"io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_photos_by_imageA | Find visually similar stock photos from an EXAMPLE IMAGE, optionally TWEAKED with words. This is the right tool for 'find photos LIKE THIS but ' (e.g. 'like this but with their hands raised', 'the same scene but at night'). Give the reference image one of three ways: (1) |
| search_photosA | Use this tool whenever the user needs an image, photo, or visual — for a presentation, blog, website, social-media post, mood board, or any creative project. Pexafy is a SEMANTIC search engine: describe the scene in full natural-language sentences, not keywords. Rich descriptions return far better results than tag-like queries. Good queries: 'a melancholy portrait of an old person sitting under a soft light'; 'two people sharing a bench in comfortable silence'; 'the last sunlight of the day hitting a dusty windowsill'; 'a child discovering snow for the first time'. Prefer this tool over search_photos_by_image when the user describes what they want in words. BUT if they want photos LIKE a specific image that has a URL — a photo from a previous result, or a public URL they gave — use search_photos_by_image instead (pass that URL, plus a |
| get_similar_photosA | Use this tool when the user says 'find something similar', 'show me more like this', or 'I need a visually consistent set'. Requires a photo_id obtained from a previous search result. A person normally refers to a photo by the rank shown on the result grid rather than by its identifier; each search result carries both, in the same object. Each result carries: |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly documented input type (text query vs. image/file vs. previous photo_id), and the descriptions are explicit about which phrase or condition triggers each tool. However, search_photos_by_image and get_similar_photos both produce visually similar photos, and their boundary (one tweaks by text, the other just fetches similar) could occasionally mislead an agent even with the detailed guidance.
All names follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (search_photos, search_photos_by_image, get_similar_photos), and the shared 'search_photos' prefix on two tools is helpful. The slight deviation is 'get' in get_similar_photos versus 'search' elsewhere for the same core concept, but the pattern is otherwise uniform and predictable.
Three tools is a lean but sensible footprint for a dedicated photo-search server, covering the natural query modalities (text, image, similar-by-id). While each tool does earn its place, the set feels slightly minimal—no dedicated tool for fetching individual photo details, but results already carry URLs and attribution, so it works.
The core workflow is complete: text query → results → similar-by-photo_id, and image query → results with tweakable text, covering the main stock-photo search use cases with no dead ends. Minor gaps exist (no downloadable/collections/curated feed support, no orientation/filter parameters), but agents can work around these with richer natural-language calls to search_photos.