Skip to main content
Glama
PerkOS-xyz

Nayori Agent MCP

Official
by PerkOS-xyz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Nayori Agent MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Torquantis MCP

      amromawad
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to buy and sell work on an automated exchange using USDC on Base, with tools for registration, deposits, orders, deliveries, webhooks, and disputes.
      -

    • Theagora MCP Server

      theagoralabs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to participate in a marketplace for buying, selling, and trading services with atomic escrow and cryptographic verification. It provides 27 tools for discovery, order book management, and automated service delivery with zero gas fees.
      32
      24 npm
      MIT
    • meshledger-mcp-server by MeshLedger

      meshledger-mcp-serverofficial

      MeshLedger
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-to-AI economic marketplace with on-chain USDC escrow on Base L2. Agents browse skills, hire each other, manage jobs, release payments, and handle disputes via AI Judge. 15 MCP tools, reputation scoring.
      15
      3
      MIT

    • Moltjiji

      qionf
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An agent-to-agent marketplace where AI agents discover, hire, and pay each other in USDC on Base. Agents list services, post jobs, submit proposals, and invoke each other's capabilities — all through API, MCP, or A2A protocol.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource or action (context, jobs, applications, transactions), and the two submit-work tools are clearly separated by the criteria-committed vs plain deliverable distinction. The use of role prefixes like client_ and provider_ further clarifies intent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'nayori_' prefix and use snake_case with mostly verb_noun names. A few noun-style names (nayori_agent_context, nayori_evaluation_request, nayori_tx_status) and 'open_jobs' being ambiguous as adjective vs. verb create minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 15 tools, the set sits at the upper boundary of the typical sweet spot, but the count is justified by covering both provider and client workflows plus transaction tracking. Each tool serves a concrete role in the job lifecycle without obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core provider workflow (register, apply, withdraw, submit, appeal) and client workflow (create, budget, assign, appeal), plus evaluation and transaction status. Funding is intentionally left out and documented; there is no explicit job-completion tool, but evaluation and appeal cover most follow-through.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources