perf-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to perf-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceVerifies AI outputs in real-time across 6 dimensions, with automatic retry and failover to ensure correct, complete, and reliable LLM responses before they reach the user's editor.5215 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProtects AI agents from bad tool outputs, schema mismatches, and tool poisoning by validating, sanitizing, and scoring reliability of tool responses.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides deterministic JSON repair and JSON Schema validation for malformed AI agent outputs, safely fixing unambiguous errors without an LLM and refusing ambiguous cases.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceValidates agent outputs in multi-agent systems to prevent coordination failures, with tools for schema verification, hallucination detection, and freshness checks, all with zero LLM cost.562 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceDeterministic JSON validation and repair for AI agents. Validates, repairs, schema-checks, and diffs JSON so long-running agents don't corrupt their session state with malformed writes.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThe first MCP server that verifies AI outputs in real-time, ensuring every LLM response is correct, complete, and reliable before it reaches your editor.215 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Tools are generally distinct but perf_correct overlaps with both perf_validate and perf_verify by covering schema violations and hallucinations, creating ambiguity. Descriptions suggest using perf_correct when unsure, which implies overlap.
All tools follow a 'perf_' prefix with a clear single verb (chat, correct, validate, verify), providing a predictable and consistent naming pattern.
Four tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose of optimizing and correcting LLM outputs, covering essential operations without bloat.
The set covers routing, general correction, schema validation, and hallucination verification. Minor gaps like explicit error logging or feedback are present, but core workflows are addressed.