browser_mouse_up

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

描述没有添加注释中已经提供的破坏性提示之外的任何行为背景。没有说明操作的副作用或先决条件。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述仅三个词，过于简短，以牺牲目的清晰度为代价追求简洁。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

考虑到大量兄弟工具和缺乏输出模式，描述完全没有说明'mouse up'的含义，与其他鼠标操作的关系，或任何使用条件，非常不完整。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

模式描述覆盖率为100%，模式中已有按钮参数的描述，描述没有添加新信息，符合基线3。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述'Press mouse up'基本上是工具名称的同义反复，没有说明'up'是释放按钮还是向上移动。与browser_mouse_down等兄弟工具缺乏区分。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

没有提供何时使用此工具或何时使用替代工具（如browser_mouse_down或browser_mouse_click_xy）的指导。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.