Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to spec-gate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for lead qualification, enabling evidence gathering from CRM, scoring, and knowledge base with role-based access and deterministic decision gating.
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes the squad-dev workflow as deterministic MCP tools, enabling task classification, risk scoring, specialist reviewer selection, and advisory verdict consolidation for code changes.
      27
      43 npm
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides lightweight documentation review tools including issue detection, readability scoring, style checking, and document summarization for integration with MCP-compatible clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Evidence-first delivery audit MCP server that evaluates task requirements against delivery evidence and returns a reproducible pass/needs_review/fail decision with a deterministic receipt.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for edge-based pharmaceutical shipment disposition decisions, returning release, review, or quarantine outcomes while recording every decision in a tamper-evident, hash-chained audit trail.
      Academic Free v1.1
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enforces governance on agentic decisions with auditable evidence records, providing tools for understanding, calibrating confidence, and navigating handoffs based on policy.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: score_request evaluates and returns a verdict, while write_record persists the decision. No overlap in functionality or ambiguity in selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (score_request, write_record), making the naming predictable and easy to infer for an agent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a domain like spec gating, but the tools cover the core workflow (scoring and recording). It's borderline but not unreasonable for a narrow purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers scoring and storing decisions but lacks obvious operations like retrieving past records or updating profiles. These gaps are notable but can be worked around for the primary gating use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues