Skip to main content
Glama
PedramMadani

spec-gate

by PedramMadani
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to spec-gate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • BRAINS MCP Server

      abhishek42638
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for lead qualification, enabling evidence gathering from CRM, scoring, and knowledge base with role-based access and deterministic decision gating.
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    • open-decision-deck

      TweetBrettMac
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for AI agents to create and read decision decks, propose cards and build plans, and retrieve finished tasks, enabling local decision review workflows with portable task handoffs.
      2
      MIT

    • squad-mcp

      ggemba
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes the squad-dev workflow as deterministic MCP tools, enabling task classification, risk scoring, specialist reviewer selection, and advisory verdict consolidation for code changes.
      27
      9 npm
      4
      Apache 2.0

    • docscanner-mcp

      Tharun135
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides lightweight documentation review tools including issue detection, readability scoring, style checking, and document summarization for integration with MCP-compatible clients.
      -

    • loopgrid-mcp

      loopgridio
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible hosts to record, retrieve, and verify LoopGrid decision evidence through tools for decisions, reviews, actions, outcomes, and verification.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • ProofGate

      yuzhiyang1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Evidence-first delivery audit MCP server that evaluates task requirements against delivery evidence and returns a reproducible pass/needs_review/fail decision with a deterministic receipt.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: score_request evaluates and returns a verdict, while write_record persists the decision. No overlap in functionality or ambiguity in selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (score_request, write_record), making the naming predictable and easy to infer for an agent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a domain like spec gating, but the tools cover the core workflow (scoring and recording). It's borderline but not unreasonable for a narrow purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers scoring and storing decisions but lacks obvious operations like retrieving past records or updating profiles. These gaps are notable but can be worked around for the primary gating use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources