Skip to main content
Glama
Pawel-BoOssko

invoice-match-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to invoice-match-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to list and process supplier invoices, run validation and fraud checks, review anomalies, summarize suppliers, and query an invoice DuckDB store through seven read-only MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents a safe way to read and check invoices, returning a deterministic APPROVE, REVIEW or STOP decision with every reason, while no tool can pay, approve or change anything.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to query and reconcile an accounts-payable ledger through safe read-only SQL, deterministic invoice-to-payment matching, and exception explanations for underpayments, duplicates, currency mismatches, and overdue invoices. Ships with a synthetic ledger, golden-set evals, and a month-end review workflow so quality can be measured in CI.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage self-hosted accounting data—invoices, balances, and books—through natural language, with read-only tools by default and optional scoped write operations.
      30
      19 PyPI
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform financial reconciliation with a deterministic proof engine: intake files, match transactions, verify proofs, resolve exceptions, and sign off on balanced journals under the user's authority.
      21
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target clearly different actions on different resources: one reads PO lines for a supplier, the other performs a three-way match on a single invoice. There is no realistic way to confuse them, and the descriptions reinforce the boundary (read-only listing vs. decision-returning validation).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names follow a snake_case verb_noun convention (list_..., check_...) that reads naturally and consistently. The only minor deviation is that list_open_purchase_orders stacks multiple qualifiers while check_invoice is terse, but the pattern is still predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin even for a narrowly scoped three-way match server; the whole workflow lives in a single check_invoice call with one supporting lookup. It is functional and focused, but borderline under-provisioned for a stated accounts-payable domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The core path (fetch PO lines with ordered/received quantities, then match an invoice) is covered, and the register flag gives basic duplicate handling. However there is no way to look up a previously registered invoice, list invoices for a supplier, inspect prior decisions, or re-check a HOLD after correction, leaving notable gaps in the lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues