Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to linux-ssh-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to securely execute shell commands on remote Linux and Windows systems via SSH connections.
      6
      23 npm
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to securely execute shell commands on remote Linux and Windows systems via SSH. It supports password and key-based authentication, command timeouts, and sudo elevation for administrative tasks.
      14
      6,535 npm
      747
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants full SSH/SFTP remote operations — session management, command execution, interactive shells, file transfers, port forwarding, and system diagnostics.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to operate on remote Linux machines via SSH, providing tools for running commands, file transfer, and background process management while keeping credentials hidden.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) SSH client server that provides autonomous SSH operations for GitHub Copilot and VS Code. Enable natural language SSH automation without manual prompts or GUI interactions.
      20
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An open MCP server that gives any AI agent SSH access to remote Linux/Unix machines — shell commands, file read/write, and SFTP transfers.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 62 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, even among similar operations like ssh_execute variants or process listing tools. Descriptions sufficiently differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'ssh_verb_noun' pattern using snake_case, with only minor deviations like ssh_whoami which is a standard command.

    Tool Count2/5

    62 tools is excessive for easy navigation, exceeding the typical well-scoped range. While the server aims to be comprehensive, many tools could be merged (e.g., multiple system info commands).

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is extremely comprehensive, covering file operations, system monitoring, Docker, package management, networking, cron, and more. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues