Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Graph AAVE MCP

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that exposes unified AI-friendly tools over Messari's standardized lending subgraphs on The Graph. One natural-language query → fan out across 40+ lending protocols on multiple chains → get back structured, comparable data.
    19
    11 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that gives AI agents direct, on-chain access to DeFi data on EVM chains — wallet balances, Aave v3 lending positions, and live token prices, with no centralized API in the middle.
    35 PyPI
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables querying Polymarket prediction market data through The Graph subgraphs. It provides tools for accessing market stats, trader P\&L, user positions, and orderbook activity using AI agents.
    35
    68 npm
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Official MCP server that turns The Graph’s Token API into a plug-and-play web3 data tool. Exposes ERC-20 & NFT metadata, balances, transfers, top-holder stats, prices, and more, allowing LLMs to run SQL queries on structured and indexed blockchain data.
    2
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server to query Polymarket prediction market data via The Graph subgraphs and REST APIs, enabling AI agents to search markets, get live prices, order books, on-chain analytics, and trader profiles.
    32
    68 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 40 tools

Disambiguation3/5

While each tool has a detailed description, there are several pairs with overlapping purposes (e.g., get_aave_liquidations vs get_risk_liquidations, get_aave_reserves vs get_v4_reserves, and multiple user-position tools). The high number of similar names could confuse an LLM despite the descriptions.

Naming Consistency2/5

Tool names use a mix of prefixes (get_, list_, find_, simulate_, query_) and sometimes include version (v4) or omit it. There is no consistent verb_noun pattern across the set, making it harder to infer behavior from the name alone.

Tool Count3/5

40 tools is on the high side, bordering on heavy. However, the server covers multiple AAVE versions, chains, and sub-domains (governance, risk, V4), so the count is somewhat justified. Some tools could be merged without loss of clarity.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers most expected queries: reserves, user positions, history, governance, risk, flash loans, liquidations, and raw subgraph access. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no cross-chain V2/V3 user summary, no tool to fetch all positions across chains), but overall it is comprehensive.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive