Ads Analytics MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Ads Analytics MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying ad campaign performance and setup across Meta, TikTok, and Google Ads using natural language through AI agents.1-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage TikTok advertising campaigns through the TikTok Ads API. Supports campaign creation, performance analytics, audience management, creative operations, and custom reporting through natural language interactions.49MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to audit and analyze LinkedIn Campaign Manager accounts, campaigns, targeting, creatives, performance, and audience demographics without requiring a LinkedIn Developer App.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to create, analyze, and optimize ad campaigns across Google Ads, Meta Ads, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Amazon Ads, and ChatGPT Ads through natural language using 400+ tools.93MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides read-only access to Meta Ads API, enabling campaign management, creative analysis, targeting research, and performance analytics via 39 tools.-
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceExposes Google Ads and Meta Marketing performance data, campaign settings, and change history to Claude (Cowork) for live daily-dashboard workflows.3-
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool is scoped by a platform prefix (google_ads/meta/tiktok) plus a specific entity or metric, so even parallel tools like get_meta_hourly_performance and get_tiktok_hourly_performance or the two anomaly signals are clearly distinguishable by platform and purpose. There is no meaningful overlap where an agent could reasonably misselect.
All data tools follow the consistent get_{platform}_{metric_or_entity} pattern (e.g. get_google_ads_keywords, get_meta_auction_rankings, get_tiktok_anomaly_signal). The single discovery tool list_clients deviates slightly but is a natural, predictable exception with no competing convention.
16 tools sits at the upper edge of the ideal range, but the count is justified: three ad platforms each get parallel coverage of performance, hourly, and diagnostics. It is slightly heavy but every tool maps to a concrete analytical need rather than being filler.
The surface covers a strong analytics lifecycle across all three platforms: campaign performance, dayparting/hourly, auction rankings, anomaly detection, plus discovery. Minor asymmetries exist (Google Ads has no auction-rankings or anomaly tool, and Meta lacks ad-level performance), but these are workaroundable gaps rather than dead ends.