Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCPGex

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets users generate regex patterns from plain-English descriptions, then verifies them with Python's real re engine against generated positive and negative test strings, iterating on failures until they pass. It exposes this as a tool callable from MCP clients such as Claude Desktop or Claude Code.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools to test regex patterns for correctness, performance (ReDoS), and memory usage, and suggests safe rewrites. Enables LLMs to iterate on regex generation with verifiable feedback.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      RegexForge gives AI agents a reliable way to get a regex without asking an LLM to hallucinate one. Pass in labeled examples (strings that should match, strings that shouldn't) plus an optional description; get back the regex, a proof matrix showing it handles every example, and a backtracking-risk audit flagging catastrophic-backtracking patterns. Pure symbolic synthesis over a template bank with
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to extract, validate, and mask personally identifiable information using deterministic regular expressions, reducing token usage and hallucination risks.
      3
      7 npm
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a tool to extract and validate regex patterns from text content, including flags, positions, and ReDoS risk assessment. Enables AI agents to identify potentially dangerous regular expressions in code or files without needing filesystem access.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: adding test cases, running tests, viewing test cases, and clearing them. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the four operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: add_test_case, test_regex, get_test_cases, clear_test_cases. The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused regex testing server. Each tool covers a necessary part of the workflow without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle of regex test case management: add, view, test, and clear. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues